• Users Online: 260
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 206-213

Live birth rates of assisted reproductive technology treatment and spontaneous conception among subfertile couples in Singapore: A follow-up study


1 Centre for Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
2 Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore; Epidemiology Department, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore

Date of Submission16-Apr-2018
Date of Decision08-May-2018
Date of Acceptance05-Jul-2018
Date of Web Publication18-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Yu Su Ling
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital
Singapore
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.241178

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Objective: To explore the potential predictors of a live birth (LB) outcome among subfertile couples of Asian ethnicity undergoing the first fertility treatment cycle; to assess the cumulative live birth rates after successive cycles; and to determine the incidence rate of spontaneous conception (SC). Methods: Subfertile couples were grouped according to treatment modalities at the first fertility treatment cycle: intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and no treatment, and were followed-up for duration up to seven years. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analyses. Results: Age of female subjects [35-38 years, odds ratio (OR): 0.39; ≥ 39 years, OR: 0.14], uterine factor subfertility (OR: 5.24), and treatment modalities (ORs: IUI 0.25, IVF 2.33 and ICSI 1.91) significantly predicted a LB outcome (P<0.05). The cumulative live birth rates were 11.7% IUI, 41.5% IVF, 27.5% ICSI and 22.6% from frozen embryo transfer cycles. The cumulative SC rate was 24.6% in the non-treated group and 10.7% in the treated group. All LBs from IVF cycles were delivered by the second cycle and within four years, compared to SC delivery of within five years in the non-treated group and six years in the treated group. Conclusions: Age of female subject, uterine factor and modalities of treatment are significant predictors for LB outcome at the first cycle. Higher delivery rates could be achieved following fewer successive IVF cycles and within a shorter duration compared to SC.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology, Semen parameters, Sperm hyaluronan-binding assay, Spontaneous conception, Subfertile Asian couples


How to cite this article:
Mee HL, Nisa dN, Ni LS, Ling YS. Live birth rates of assisted reproductive technology treatment and spontaneous conception among subfertile couples in Singapore: A follow-up study. Asian Pac J Reprod 2018;7:206-13

How to cite this URL:
Mee HL, Nisa dN, Ni LS, Ling YS. Live birth rates of assisted reproductive technology treatment and spontaneous conception among subfertile couples in Singapore: A follow-up study. Asian Pac J Reprod [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 26];7:206-13. Available from: http://www.apjr.net/text.asp?2018/7/5/206/241178

Foundation Project: This study was supported by Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research Fund, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.





  1. Introduction Top


Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been regarded as an effective treatment for subfertile couples due to the perceived high success rates[1],[2]. However, the prediction factors for a successful live birth (LB) outcomes among subfertile couples of Asian ethnicity are limited[3],[4].

The primary aim of this study was to explore the potential predictors of a LB outcome among subfertile couples of Asian ethnicity attempting their first treatment cycle (C1). The secondary aims were to assess the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) after successive cycles (Cs) and the incidence rate of spontaneous conception (SC) during a follow-up duration up to seven years.


  2. Materials and methods Top


2.1. Subjects

This was a retrospective study of a cohort of subfertile couples of Asian ethnicity who had attended the Fertility Augmentation Clinic (FAC) at Singapore General Hospital, Singapore between December 2003 and up to December 2012. The eligibility criteria were: (i) couples who were unable to conceive after trying for more than one year of unprotected intercourse; (ii) male spouses who had submitted semen samples for seminal analysis and sperm hyaluronan-binding assay (HBA) at post-FAC visit for basic male infertility work-up between December 2003 and December 2008; and (iii) couples who had undergone post-FAC fertility treatment, inclusive of intrauterine insemination (IUI) therapy, in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at Centre for Assisted Reproduction (CARE), Singapore General Hospital.

HBA assessed the ability of the sperm to bind to hyaluronan[5]. Hyaluronan-bound sperm demonstrated fertilizing ability, developmental maturity, reduced frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies and lack of DNA fragmentation[5],[6],[7].

The exclusion criteria were: (i) male subjects who were azoospermic or cryptozoospermic (sperm concentration = 0 or <0.2 million/mL, respectively); (ii) female subjects who were recipients of donor embryos; and (iii) couples who went to other institutions for fertility treatment or were lost to follow-up.

The medical records were retrieved from and did not leave the Health Management Information office, Singapore General Hospital. Each couple was given a coded identifier for which, all statistical analyses were performed. Data for baseline characteristics at FAC (female age, duration of subfertility, obstetrical history and subfertility diagnoses), prior-to-FAC (number of previous treatment cycles) and post-FAC treatment outcome achieved at C1 and after Cs were reviewed. Male factor subfertility was defined as having total motile sperm count (TMSC) of <20 million/ejaculate. TMSC was the product of semen volume, sperm concentration and progressive motility and was divided by 100%. Unexplained subfertility was defined as couples who had normal findings in their fertility work-up. The time-to-livebirth (TTLB) delivery was calculated from the date of fertility work-up to the date of delivery. The duration of follow-up was calculated from the date of fertility work-up to the date of last consultation visit for couples who did not achieve any LB. This study was approved by the Singhealth Centralized Institutional Review Board, Singapore (SHS IRB 2009/068/D). Written informed consent was not obtained from subjects as this was a retrospective study using data retrieved from medical records.

All fresh cycle and frozen embryo transfer (FET) procedures were carried out using couples own gametes. Pregnancy outcome was defined as clinical pregnancy (detection of fetal heart activity at 6-7 weeks of gestation by ultrasonography), LB delivery after SC (SLB), LB (the birth of single, twins or triplets at one delivery) and pregnancy loss (including biochemical, missed abortions; miscarriages; ectopic, voluntary or medical termination of pregnancies).

2.2. Semen samples

Seminal analysis was performed according to the standard laboratory guidelines (World Health Organization,1999)[8]. Progressive motility was the sum of rapid and slow motility (grade A + B). Sperm concentration was assessed using an improved Neubauer haemocytometer. Normal sperm morphology was assessed following Tygerberg strict criteria[9].

HBA was assessed using commercial HBA kits (Biocoat, Fort Washington, USA)[5]. Briefly, an aliquot of the semen was applied on the HBA chamber slide, covered with a Cell-Vu grid coverslip and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The HBA score (%) was the number of bound motile sperm (no progressive head movement and with rapid beating of the principal piece) divided by the total number of bound and unbound motile sperm (move freely), multiplied by 100%.

2.3. Fertility treatment

2.3.1. IUI

Majority (approximately 90%) of the female subjects received oral supplement of 50 mg or 100 mg of clomiphene citrate (Clomid, Medochemie Ltd, Singapore) on day 2-6 of their menstrual cycle. The rest were either followed through their natural menstrual cycle or received mild ovulation induction with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone to achieve the growth of 1-2 dominant follicles. When at least one of the follicles was greater than 18 mm in diameter, 5 000 or 10 000 IU of human chorionic gonadotrophin (Pregnyl®, Organon) was administered. On the day of IUI, semen sample was collected and motile sperm was prepared by conventional swim-up method. Single IUI procedure was carried out using a soft catheter (Wallace, Smiths Medical, Australia) to transport 0.25 mL of the prepared sperm through the cervix into the uterine cavity.

2.3.2. IVF / ICSI / FET

The decisions for couples to undergo either the IVF or ICSI treatment at C1 or Cs, the controlled ovarian stimulation regimes, starting and daily doses and the duration of stimulation were made with due consideration and discussion by a team of clinicians at CARE[10]. Fertilization rate (%) was defined as the number of oocytes fertilized, either divided by number of mature oocytes (for IVF) or divided by number of mature oocytes injected (for ICSI), multiplied by 100%. Embryos were not transferred on subjects who were either at risk of having ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, high progesterone level, fever (no transfer) or occurrence of fertilization failure. The embryos which were not transferred were frozen and subsequently thawed for the FET cycles. All fertility treatment was performed based on the standard operating protocol at CARE.

Post-FAC C1: Couples were categorized according to their C1 treatment, i.e. IUI, IVF, ICSI or the non- treatment (NT) group if they did not undergo treatment cycle.

Post-FAC Cs: After the fertility work-up, couples were followed-up for a period up to seven years during which they may have received more than one treatment cycle.

2.4. Statistical analyses

Descriptive analysis was performed; for continuous variables, normality was tested using quantile-quantile plots. The data were summarized as mean and standard deviation (Mean ± SD) for normally distributed data or as median and inter-quartile ranges (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Categorical data were summarized as frequency and proportion.

The baseline characteristics at C1 were stratified to several categories. The number of couples who had LBs was compared between the stratification categories and the modalities of treatment using Chi-squared test. The semen parameters, age of female subjects (at FAC, first cycle, and first LB delivery), TTLB delivery or duration of follow-up, the number of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes, embryos transferred, cryopreserved and fertilization rates among couples who had LBs were compared to those who did not have LB using Mann-Whitney U test, for each modalities of treatment. The clinical pregnancy/cycle, pregnancy loss/cycle, LB/cycle rates and the number of childbirths (singletons, twins and triplets) by the different modalities of treatment were compared using Chi-squared test. The relationship between two continuous variables were evaluated using non-parametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient, r.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the potential predictors of LB outcomes at C1. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21; Chicago, IL, USA). Graphs were used to present the CLBRs for the various modalities of conception against the number of Cs, as well as against the TTLB deliveries. The graphs were generated using the Excel 2010 (Microsoft Office).


  3. Results Top


A total of 983 couples had attended the FAC during the study period and their medical records were retrieved. One hundered and seventeen couples were excluded from the study due to: spouses who were azoospermic or cryptozoospermic (n=8); had repeated seminal analyses and HBA (n=27); couples who were recipients of donor embryos (n=7) and couples who went to other institutions for fertility treatment or were lost to follow-up (n=75). Therefore, 866 couples were eligible and were included in the final data analyses. The mean age of the female subjects at FAC visit was (32.6 ± 4.5) years and the median duration of subfertility was 3.0 years (IQR: 1.5-5.0 years).

There were 259 couples who received IUI, 47 IVF, 193 ICSI and 367 did not undergo any treatment at C1. Female age at FAC was stratified to ≤ 30 years (n=284), 31-34 years (n=307), 35-38 years (n=178) and ≥; 39 years (n=97). Duration of subfertility were stratified to ≤2 years (n=359), >2-5 years (n=318), >5-7 years (n=83), ≥7 years (n=83) and unknown (n=23). Obstetrical history were categorized as primary (n=615) and secondary subfertility (n=251). Subfertility diagnoses were tubal factor (n=37), endometriosis (n=47), ovulatory disorders (n=108), uterine factor (n=87), mixed female factor (n=172), male factor (n=58), mixed female and male factor (n=130) and unexplained subfertility (n=227). Previous treatment cycles were stratified to 0 (n=722), 1-3 (n=124), 4-6 (n=17) and >7 (n=3) [Table 1].
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of couples who have had LBs, grouped according to the modalities of treatment at C1 [%)].

Click here to view


3.1. CI

In this cohort study, the overall LB/cycle rate achieved at C1 was 16.6% (144/866). The clinical pregnancy/cycle rates achieved by the various modalities of treatment were significantly different: 8.5%

(22/259) for IUI, 38.3% (18/47) IVF, 29.0% (56/193) ICSI and 22.1% (81/367) after SC in the NT group, P<0.001. The pregnancy loss/cycle rates were: 1.9%, 4.3%, 6.2% and 3.8%, respectively, P>0.05. Thus, the corresponding LB/cycle rates were 6.6% IUI, 34.0% IVF, 22.8% ICSI and 18.3% SC in the NT group. The number of live births achieved at C1 varied across the baseline characteristic stratifications and treatment modalities [Table 1]. In the univariate analysis, subfertility diagnosis and the number of previous treatment cycles were significantly associated with LB outcomes, P<0.05. The number of childbirths were significantly different for the various treatment modalities; i.e. 17 singletons were born after IUI, 8 after IVF, 32 after ICSI and 67 in the NT group; 7 pairs of twins were born after IVF and 10 pairs after ICSI; one set of triplets was born after IVF and 2 sets were born after ICSI, P<0.001.

The semen parameters and HBA scores were compared by whether or not a LB was achieved for the various modalities of treatment [Table 2]. The parameters were significantly different: progressive motility (P=0.047) for IUI group; sperm concentration (P=0.027) for ICSI group; and sperm concentration (P=0.001), normal morphology (P=0.033), TMSC (P=0.004) and HBA scores (P=0.020) for the NT group.
Table 2: Comparison on the descriptive parameters and the outcome of C1 between couples with and without LBs.

Click here to view


Progressive motility, sperm concentration, morphology and TMSC were significantly correlated to HBA score, r = 0.419, 0.322, 0.553 and 0.344, respectively, P<0.001. HBA scores were not correlated to the rates of oocyte fertilization among the IVF or the ICSI group. The number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilized and cryopreserved embryos were negatively correlated to female age among the ICSI group, r = -0.268, -0.261 and -0.294, P<0.001, respectively. These correlations were not observed among the IVF group.

The study also investigated factors that could potentially influence on LB outcome at C1 [Table 3]. Older women were less likely to have a succcessful delivery compared to women aged <30 years. Women with uterine factor subfertility were more likely to succeed compared to those with tubal factor. There was a higher likelihood of achieving a LB among women who had undergone IVF or ICSI compared to the NT, while those who had undergone IUI were 75% less likely to achieve a LB.
Table 3: Multivariable associations of potential predictors for LB outcome following C1.

Click here to view


3.2. Cs

The median duration of follow-up in this study was 3.6 years (IQR: 2.5-4.8 years). 58% (504/866) of the couples had attempted a total Cs of 1 017, median of two cycles (IQR: 1-3 cycles). The maximum number of cycles attempted was: IUI=7, IVF=3, ICSI= 4, and FET=4. In total, 266 couples had undergone 491 successive IUI cycles, 65 couples had 77 IVF cycles, 247 couples had 312 ICSI cycles and 106 couples had 137 FET cycles [Table 4].
Table 4: Couples' attempts at Cs and the treatment outcomes.

Click here to view


The corresponding total LB/cycle rates achieved were: 6.3% IUI, 35.1% IVF, 21.8% ICSI and 17.5% FET. The CLBRs were: 11.7% after IUI, 41.5% IVF, 27.5% ICSI and 22.6% FET. The CLBRs peaked at the seventh cycle after IUI, at the second cycle after IVF and ICSI and at the third cycle after FET [Figure 1]A. Among these 504 couples who had successful or unsuccessful Cs: 24 couples who had undergone one treated cycle, subsequently conceived spontaneously and had SLBs (refered as the second cycle); 18 couples who had 2 treated cycles, conceived spontaneously and had SLBs (the third cycle), 11 couples who had 3 treated cycles, had SLBs (fourth cycles) and one couple who had 4 treated cycles, had SLB (fifth cycle); thus, a total of 54 couples had treated cyles had SLBs (CLBR 10.7%), [Figure 1]A.
Figure 1: CLBRs for the total cohort of 866 couples undergoing successive treatment cycles during the duration up to 7 years of follow-up period.
A: Comparison of the CLBRs according to the modalities of conception. X-axis is the number of treatment cycles, truncated to 5 cycles. B: Comparison of the CLBRs according to the modalities of conception. X-axis is the TTLB delivery (years). CLBR: Cumulative live birth rate; TTLB: Time- to-live-birth delivery; IUI: intrauterine insemination; IVF: in vitro fertilization; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; FET: frozen embryo transfer.


Click here to view


In the NT group, 5 couples had attempted a total of 8 successive cycles of IUI without success [Table 4]. The remainder 362 couples did not undergo any fertility treatment throughout the follow-up period. 73 of these couples conceived spontaneously and had one LB, 14 subsequently had a second LB and two couples had a third LB, thus, a total of 89 SLBs (CLBR 24.6%) were delivered [Figure 1]A.

All LBs were delivered within TTLB of four years after IVF, compared to SLBs deliveries within five years among the non-treated couples and six years among couples who had treatment [Figure 1]B. In all, 33.8% (293/866) of the couples achieved at least one LB at the end of the follow-up period.

In tracking the actual treatment attempts during the followed- up period, couples who had started with IUI at C1 subsequently underwent a total of 481 successive IUI cycles, 18 of these couples proceeded with 21 IVF cycles, 49 couples attempted 58 ICSI cycles, 19 couples had 27 FET cycles and 34 couples had SLBs: the CLBR achieved was 33.6% (87/259) and 106 LBs (inclusive of singleton, twins and triplets) were delivered in all. Likewise, couples who had started with IVF treatment subsequently underwent a total of two IUI cycles, 56 successive IVF, 5 ICSI, 22 FET cycles and had 8 SLBs: CLBR was 57.4% (27/47) and a total of 42 LBs delivered. The ICSI group did not attempt any IUI or IVF cycles, had 249 successive ICSI cycles, 88 FET cycles and had 12 SLBs: CLBR was 37.3% (72/193) and a total of 103 LBs deliveries.


  4. Discussion Top


In this retrospective cohort study on subfertile couples attempting fertility treatment at our Centre, we sought to determine the prognostic factors to predict LB outcome at the first fertility treatment. Our study demonstrated women younger than 35 years had higher odds of achieving LBs and the odds greatly reduced as age increased. This trend could be due to the decline in the number of retrievable mature and fertilizable oocytes as women get older. Our findings are in line with previous studies on the adverse effect of increasing age on the success rates of fertility treatment[10],[11],[12].

Our study has shown that women with uterine factor subfertility were more likely to achieve a LB than tubal factor. In the review by Zarinara et al, demographic and clinical factors influence treatment success, e.g. duration of infertility, body mass index, obstetrical history, ovarian size, ovulation disorders, tubal factors, unexplained infertility, male factor or previous treatment cycles, etc[13].

Treatment modalities varied in their effect on LB outcomes in our cohort. The LB/cycle rate and the pregnancy loss rate were considerably low with IUI therapy, probably due the stimulation regime with clomiphene citrate. In contrast, other studies reported higher pregnancy/cycle rate of 12.6% to 19.6% with stimulation regime of gonadotrophin, albeit high rates of pregnancy loss, cycle cancellation and multiple pregnancy[11],[14]. We propose IUI therapy should not be recommended at C1 to the following groups of female subjects due to substantially low success rate; i.e. age ≥ 35 years, duration of subfertility of >5 years, tubal factor, endometriosis, unexplained subfertility, spouse having male factor and those who had previous treatment cycles, similarly reported by Nuojua- Huttunen et al[11].

In our study, IVF could be offered as the treatment of choice as the likelihood of achieving a LB was significantly higher. When considering IVF and ICSI as related treatment in our cohort, the overall LB/cycle rate at C1 was 25% (60/240), similar to 26.5% in the study by Witsenburg et al[15]. Purcell et al has reported Asian women achieved a LB rate of 26.9% compared to Caucasians (34.9%)[3]. Other studies have shown lower clinical pregnancy or LB rates in Asian women compared to other ethnicities, which could explain the overall low IVF/ICSI success rate in our study cohort of Asian subjects[4],[16],[17].

To our knowledge, our study is the first to show sperm concentration, morphology, TMSC and HBA were significantly higher in the non-treated couples who had SLBs compared to those who did not have SLB. However, these parameters lack significance for prediction of LB outcome. Other studies reported SC rates of 34% and 38% in infertile couples and semen parameters were significantly associated with the occurrence of SC[18],[19]. Our findings also showed no associations between HBA scores and fertility treatment outcome, which were consistent with several other studies[20],[21]. In contrast, HBA scores have been shown to significantly correlate with embryo quality, cleavage rates, fertilization rates, implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and pregnancy loss rates[22],[23].

The strength of our study lies in our approach into investigating the prognostic factors contributing to the success rate at C1. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the limitation of using these factors; they were assessed prior to starting a fertility treatment, applicable only for the prediction of success rate at C1 and for subjects of Asian ethnicity. In contrast, success of fertility treatment is also dependent on other post-treatment factors, i.e. the numbers and quality of fertilized oocytes or transferred embryos which we did not include in the prediction analysis[16],[17],[22].

Our study has shown that the total LB/cycle rates achieved after Cs for the individual treatment modalities were rather similar to the rates at C1, indicating that increases in the number of treatment cycles do not result in additional increase to the LB outcome. The CLBRs showed a trend across the seven years. We propose four cycles of IUI therapy to be sufficient as 94% of the LBs were delivered within TTLB of two years, similar to other reports of 97% to 100% pregnancies within the first three or four cycles[11],[14]. The CLBRs for IVF treatment in our cohort reached the peak at the second cycle and within TTLB delivery of four years. In contrast, other studies reported high ART success rates; CLBRs of 59% to 69.4% after six or seven cycles, or between five to seven years of follow-up duration[15],[24],[25].

The 3-year CLBR of SC in our cohort was considerably low, 21.8% among couples who remained untreated and 9.1% among the total cohort, compared to higher CLBRs found in other studies[26],[27]. We observed CLBR of 10.7% of SLB among the treated couples. Other follow-up studies have reported cumulative delivery rates after SC of 4.6% to 22.2% in couples who had finished or discontinued unsuccessful or successful IVF/ ICSI treatment[24],[28],[29],[30].

One final strength of our study was that we had followed the actual treatment attempts of couples over a long duration of up to seven years. Our findings were that IVF was the most effective modality of treatment at the first cycle as well as after successive cycles; couples who had started with IUI cycles and proceeded with ART treatment achieved higher success rate and SC occurred among the subfertile couples, albeit lower incidence rate and longer time to achieve a LB compared to attempting fertility treatment.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first follow-up study on subfertile couples of Asian ethnicity undergoing successive treatment cycles. Our study suggests female age, subfertility diagnosis and modalities of treatment are key factors when deciding on fertility program. Future research could explore semen analysis and sperm functional assessment as a concerted effort to improve fertility outcomes.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms Asiah, Ms Barbara Poh and the staffs from the Health Information Management Services for their assistance in retrieval of medical records; the authors also thank Ms Ruth Wong from the Centre for Assisted Reproduction for data entry and Ms Hum Siew Chen for the coordination and data retrieval.



 
  References Top

1.
Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. A formal comparison of the practice of assisted reproduction technologies between Europe and the USA. Hum Reprod 2006; 8: 1945-1950.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Andersen AN, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproduction technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 1267-1287.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Purcell K, Schembri M, Frazier LM, Rall MJ, Shen S, Croughan M, et al. Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 297-302.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fujimoto VY, Luke B, Brown MB, Jain T, Armstrong A, Grainger DA, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 382-390.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Huszar G, Ozkavukcu S, Jakab A, Celik-Ozenci C, Sati GL, Cayli S. Hyaluronic acid binding ability of human sperm reflects cellular maturity and fertilizing potential: Selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 260-267.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Jakab A, Sakkas D, Delpiano E, Cayli S, Kovanci E, Ward D, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A novel selection method for sperm with normal frequency of chromosomal aneuploidies. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 1665-1673.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Ciampaglia W, Filicori M. “Physiologic ICSI”: Hyaluronic acid (HA) favors selection of spermatozoa without DNA fragmentation and with normal nucleus, resulting in improvement of embryo quality. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 598-604.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112-117.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ho LM, Aw TC, Hum SC, Lee SN, Chung FCM, Yu SL. Basal serum anti-müllerian hormone and antral follicle count are predictors of ovarian response for Asian women in Singapore. Asian Pac J Reprod 2014; 3: 169-175.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: An analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 698-703.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Stolwijk AM, Wetzels AMM, Braat DDM. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman’s age, subfertility diagnosis and primary and secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 203-209.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zarinara A, Zeraati H, Kamali K, Mohammad K, Shahnazari P, Akhondi MM. Models predicting success of infertility treatment: A systematic review. J Reprod Infertil 2016; 17: 68-81.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thomson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): Statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1892-1896.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Witsenburg C, Dieben S, Van der Westerlaken L, Verburg H, Naaktgeboren N. Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 99-107.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Baker VL, Luke B, Brown MB, Alvero R, Frattarelli JL, Usadi R, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting probability of pregnancy and live birth with in vitro fertilization: An analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1410-1416.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dhillon RK, McLernon DJ, Smith PP, Fishel S, Dowell K, Deeks JJ, et al. Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: A novel pretreatment counselling tool. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 84-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ayala C, Steinberger E, Smith DP. The influence of semen analysis parameters on the fertility potential of infertile couples. J Androl 1996; 17: 718-725.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sripada S, Townend J, Campbell D, Murdoch L, Mathers E, Bhattacharya S. Relationship between semen parameters and spontaneous pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 624-630.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yildirim M, Duvan ZCI, Pekel A, Ayrim A, Kafali H. Can hyaluronan binding assay predict the outcome of intrauterine insemination in couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility? J Reprod Infertil 2015; 16: 18-23.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ye H, Huang GN, Gao Y, Liu DY. Relationship between human sperm-hyaluronan binding assay and fertilization rate in conventional in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1545-1550.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
To CFC, Lee SN, Lim MN, Yu SL. Relationship between sperm hyaluronan-binding assay (HBA) scores on embryo development, fertilisation and pregnancy rate in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Proc Singapore Healthcare 2013; 22: 120-124.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Worrilow KC, Eid S, Woodhouse D, Perloe M, Smith S, Witmyer J, et al. Use of hyaluronan in the selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI): Significant improvement in clinical outcomes— multicentre, double-blinded and randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 306-314.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Osmanagaoglu K, Tournaye H, Camus M, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Cumulative delivery rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: 5 year follow-up of 498 patients. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2651-2655.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Pinborg A, Hougaard CO, Andersen AN, Molbo D, Schmidt L. Prospective longitudinal cohort study on cumulative 5-year delivery and adoption rates among 1 338 couples initiating infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2009; 24: 991-999.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Collins JA, Burrows EA, Willan AR. The prognosis of live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 22-28.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Snick HKA, Snick TS, Evers JLH, Collins JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: The Walceren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1582-1588.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hennelly B, Harrison RF, Kelly J, Jacob S, Barrett T. Spontaneous conception after successful attempt at in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 774-778.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shimizu Y, Kodama H, Fukuda J, Murata M, Kumagai J, Tanaka T. Spontaneous conception after the birth of infants conceived through in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 35-39.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Osmanagaoglu K, Collins JA, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, et al. Spontaneous pregnancies in couples who discontinued intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: A 5-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 550-556.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  2. Materials and...
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2360    
    Printed164    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded291    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal