• Users Online: 263
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 297-298

Human blastomere rotation in early cleavage embryos is not associated with reduced implantation: Evidence from time-lapse videography


1 School of Human Sciences, the University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
2 School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia; Reproductive Medicine Center, Tianjin United Family Hospital, Tianjin, China
3 School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University; Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia

Date of Submission20-May-2019
Date of Decision22-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance10-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication07-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Emma P Langdon
School of Human Sciences, the University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6027
Australia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.270108

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Human embryos, Blastomere rotation, Time-lapse videography


How to cite this article:
Langdon EP, Liu Yh, Matson PL, Mark PJ. Human blastomere rotation in early cleavage embryos is not associated with reduced implantation: Evidence from time-lapse videography. Asian Pac J Reprod 2019;8:297-8

How to cite this URL:
Langdon EP, Liu Yh, Matson PL, Mark PJ. Human blastomere rotation in early cleavage embryos is not associated with reduced implantation: Evidence from time-lapse videography. Asian Pac J Reprod [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 26];8:297-8. Available from: http://www.apjr.net/text.asp?2019/8/6/297/270108



Dear Editor,

Time-lapse videography of human embryos allows for the easy visualization of the embryos without removing them from the protective environment of the incubator[1], the measurement of various morphokinetic (quantitative) parameters[2], and the identification of abnormalities of growth (qualitative parameters) such as direct cleavage[3], reverse cleavage[4] and intercellular contact of blastomeres[5]. This extensive viewing gives the opportunity to apply algorithms to predict implantation based upon morphokinetic parameters[2],[6] or a combination of qualitative and quantitative measures[7]. However, one major limitation is the poor transferability of algorithms between laboratories[8] presumably because embryos exhibit plasticity when grown in different laboratories[9]. Qualitative parameters are more reproducible markers of embryo quality between laboratories given their binary nature[9], (i.e. present or absent), and so any qualitative parameter associated with reduced implantation may prove useful in an algorithm.

Embryo rolling, also known as blastomere rolling or movement, involves blastomeres moving around each other creating a rotation but without dividing. In a recent set of proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by time-lapse[10], embryo rolling was listed as an additional annotation that might be indicative of irregular cleavage events, although no evidence was presented on its clinical usefulness. More recently, blastomere movement was categorized into 3 types and their occurrence at the 2-cell stage was shown to be independent of pregnancy outcomes[11]. It is still unclear in terms of the impact of such movement or rolling in the spatial perspective apart from the temporal perspective. A retrospective analysis of time-lapse recordings was therefore undertaken to determine if the degree of blastomere rolling is associated with a reduced implantation rate, and to evaluate whether blastomere rolling may be a useful timelapse videography parameter for the inclusion in an algorithm to predict implantation potential.

A retrospective audit was undertaken by using de-identified cycle information from in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles at Fertility North (Perth, Western Australia, Australia). The 155 women ranged from 24.3 to 44.5 years in age, with a mean age of 34 years, and all had signed a consent (FNC1) for the use of stored data to be used for practice management and quality assurance. This form had been approved by the Joondalup Health Campus Human Research Ethics Committee becoming effective on 17th February 2017. Cycles included in the analysis were the women’s first IVF cycle and only if the woman was having a single embryo transfer of an embryo showing no evidence of direct or reverse cleavage. All women had embryo transfer on day 3, and those women who required extended culture with a blastocyst transfer were excluded. After insemination via either conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fertilized oocytes were then placed into the Embryoscope™ incubator (Vitrolife, Denmark) and cultured until day 3, with images being taken every 10 min at 7 focal planes on each embryo, as previously described[7]. Embryos for transfer were viewed retrospectively using the EmbryoViewer software (Vitrolife, Sweden), and blastomere movement was tracked up until it was removed from the incubator for transfer. Successful implantation of the embryo was confirmed by the detection of a fetal heartbeat at 7 weeks of gestation. Quantification of embryo rolling activity was performed manually by one scientist (Emma P Langdon) using a measuring device with a quadrant grid placed over the circumference of the embryo on the screen. Embryos were assessed at the 2-cell and 4-cell stages, and rolling activity was graded as (a) 0° being no rolling; (b) rolling of 1°-90° and (c) rolling between 90° and 180°. Rolling was significantly more prevalent in 2-cell embryos (34/155, 21.9%) than 4-cell embryos (5/155, 3.2%; χ2=24.67, P<0.001). For 2-cell embryos, there was no difference in implantation rates (χ2=0.0478, P>0.05) when there was 0° (51/121, 42.1%), 1°-90° (12/27, 44.4%) or >90° (3/7, 42.9%) rotation. The low level of rotation in 4-cell embryos made statistical analysis unreliable, and only one embryo showed rolling at both stages. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval), there was no effect upon implantation of blastomere angle of rotation at 2-cell (1.167, 0.630-2.163; P=0.624) or 4-cell (5.494, 0.586-51.540; P=0.136) or embryo grading with conventional criteria (1.145, 0.562-2.333; P=0.750), but maternal age had a negative effect (0.923, 0.858-0.994; P=0.034). Interestingly, maternal age appeared to show a trend towards significance in affecting the incidence of rolling (P=0.057), as the mean age of women with rolling embryos was higher than those with non-rolling embryos [(35.4 ± 4.7) years old vs (33.7 ± 4.5) years old].

In summary, embryo rolling has been suggested in a contemporary European guideline[10] as being an annotation worth recording with time-lapse videography. Unfortunately, the present study has shown that embryo rolling is not a useful indicator of implantation potential either for embryo selection or deselection. This lack of predictive value means it should not be considered as a parameter for inclusion in an algorithm to rank the implantation potential of human embryos.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Mizobe Y, Akiyoshi T, Minami S, Matsuo K, Fukushima R, Yamaguchi A, et al. Effect of a time-lapse incubator (EmbryoScope®) on in vitro culture of human embryos. J Mamm Ova Res 2014; 31(1): 40-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohí J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(10): 2658-2671.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escribá M-J, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: A timelapse study. Fertil Steril 2012; 98(6): 1458-1463.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the Embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril 2014; 102(5): 1295-1300.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Liu Y, Chapple V, Feenan K, Roberts P, Matson P. Clinical significance of intercellular contact at the four-cell stage of human embryos, and the use of abnormal cleavage patterns to identify embryos with low implantation potential: A time-lapse study. Fertil Steril 2015; 103(6): 1485-1491.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Petersen BM, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner DK. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on day 3. Hum Reprod 2016; 31(10): 2231-2244.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Liu Y, Chapple V, Feenan K, Roberts P, Matson P. Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: The combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth. Fertil Steril 2016; 105(3): 656-662.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Fréour T, Le Fleuter N, Lammers J, Splingart C, Reignier A, Barrière P. External validation of a time-lapse prediction model. Fertil Steril 2015; 103(4): 917-922.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Liu Y, Copeland C, Stevens A, Feenan K, Chapple V, Myssonski K, et al. Assessment of human embryos by time-lapse videography: A comparison of quantitative and qualitative measures between two independent laboratories. Reprod Biol 2015; 15(4): 210-216.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ciray HN, Campbell A, Agerholm IE, Aguilar J, Chamayou S, Esbert M, et al. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod 2014; 29(12): 2650-2660.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ezoe K, Ohata K, Morita H, Ueno S, Miki T, Okimura T, et al. Prolonged blastomere movement induced by the delay of pronuclear fading and first cell division adversely affects pregnancy outcomes after fresh embryo transfer on day 2: A time-lapse study. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38(5): 659-668.  Back to cited text no. 11
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1525    
    Printed86    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded154    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal